I’m not going to bore you with the full history of
gerrymandering, because you learned about it in 9th grade if you’re
my age, and in college if you’re significantly younger (50 is significantly
younger). I will share the origins of the term – a map most of you have seen –
named for Governor Elbridge Gerry, in 1812 Massachusetts. Dunno what
Massachusetts is named for, but it is a spelling bee buster. Anyway, here’s the
map:
You would think that a representative democracy – if that’s
what the US is – would by now have found a way to be, well, representative. But
no, not so much. As recently as July of last year, the 4th Circuit
Court said that the North Carolina’s voter ID law targeted people of color with
“almost surgical precision.” You could almost hear the state’s liberals moan
ecstatically in unison. This ruling was challenged, went to Supreme Court, and
was promptly denied reconsideration. Shortly thereafter, the Supremes struck
down both federal legislative and state General Assembly districts as illegal
gerrymanders. Here’s what the illegal federal
map looks like:
In the lawsuit that resulted in the ruling described above, it was noted that you could drive the length of District 12 with you car doors open and kill everyone in the District.
I don’t have a good map of the 28 State senate and house
seats the Court said were illegally gerrymandered. Feel free to Google it; it’s
basically just a map of the state. I do have one of many proposed maps -- this one created by a computer -- that purports to represent nonpartisan districting:
There’s been a lot of pissing and moaning by members of the
legislature since these rulings about “When!” and “How!” and “It’s Not Fair!”
They’ve been throwing their food on the floor and weeping loudly and stamping
their little feet. But they’re not complete idiots, all evidence to the
contrary. They have now declared that they are going to draw maps in which they
take NO ACCOUNT of race. The implication is that they are only going to
consider political preference in their next effort. Purely political = not justiciable,
or so they’re hoping. And that’s damned
clever, because in North Carolina race and party preferences overlap with . . .
wait for it . . . almost surgical precision. Ta Dah!
Here’s a map of the State by race:
And here’s a map of voter preferences in the 2012 election
(when Democrats actually got off their asses to vote):
|
And so, as we gird up for the next round of lawsuits, let me
modestly suggest that In The Meantime, we do not have a lawfully elected
legislature. It seems to me that actions of a racially gerrymandered political
body are ipso facto racist and/or unconstitutional.
Wait, Tom! You’re not suggesting that everything the
Legislature has done since those 28 gerrymandered seats were filled needs to be
redone? Why, that could delay any new work for months – even years!
And the problem with that would be? According to Mark Twain
(or, maybe, Gideon J. Tucker) “No man's life, liberty, or property are safe
while the legislature is in session.” Seriously, I
wouldn’t mind at all a return to the days when we funded our schools and our
Medicaid system and it was still illegal to drive over people in the streets.
No comments:
Post a Comment